A sad affair and poor decision, in my book. He'll get a lot of money. He'll camouflage greed with lofty literary mumbo-jumbo. He may even become a literary hero. Brings to mind the end of Mahagonny, "You cannot help a dead man."
clipped from www.npr.org
All Things Considered, April 30, 2008 · Vladimir Nabokov's final work — an unfinished manuscript scholars call The Original of Laura — was meant to be destroyed 30 years ago. When Nabokov died in 1977, he left instructions for his heirs to burn the 138 handwritten index cards that made up the rough draft. But Nabokov's wife, Vera, couldn't bear to destroy her husband's last work, and when she died, the fate of the manuscript fell to her son. Dmitri Nabokov, now 73, is the Russian novelist's only surviving heir. He says he inherited the problem of whether to honor his father's wishes or save the literary master's last written words for posterity. But after 30 years of grappling with the decision, Nabokov has announced his plans to publish the novel. |
1 comment:
Hello!
I heard the story on NPR myself and was filled with very mixed emotions. On the one hand, I felt much as you do that it is sad that his dying request will not be honored.
But, on the other hand, a part of me also feels *glad* the writings were not destroyed because that in itself feels so terribly wrong... to destroy art is a grave sin (in my opinion).
The difficulty for me is in how to view this. It would have been far, far better if he had destroyed the work himself prior to his death. An artist can make his/her own mind up to determine what is art and what is not.
Because he himself did not destroy the work puts up a philosohpical wall of difference to me in that I feel angst at anyone destroying someone else's work... and I guess that includes even when asked to do so. It seems a very unfair position for the family to have been placed in.
His decision to not destroy his own work (if that is what he truly wanted) made for a very hard situation for his family.
PipeTobacco
Post a Comment