I began my career at the tail end of the "writer worship" cycle, when the serious writer was like a priest, following a calling, when literary novels were published by publishers hoping to break even at best, published because they were GOOD, not commercial (it was the profits from commercial pap that made this honorable charge possible), when the literary culture was driven by men, drinking, promiscuity, sexism, abusive and self-indulgent behavior. Artists were forgiven for having rotten personal lives if their work was good. What is astounding is the focus of this book: the bright women who became the groupies for these male writers
Now, of course, the pendulum has swung to the other extreme, where the once valued "literary novel" is used as a pejorative description, where the writer as priest has become the writer as entrepreneur, where marketing matters more than content.
I vote for the writer as hermit. I vote for Norman Brown: "Doing nothing, if properly understood, is the supreme action." Of course, I'm an alien.
1 comment:
I liked this. The idea of the "literary novel" seems so out now. On facebook the question is raised again whether it's dead, and if so I have to think that it will rise again. Is it all cyclical or not?
Post a Comment