Sponsors were hoping the backgrounds of these witnesses would mean they would be taken seriously. Apparently not. Same o, same o.
clipped from in.news.yahoo.com
|
"The struggle itself ... is enough to fill a man's heart." --Camus
FREE SCREENWRITING TUTORIAL (click)
"Remarkable" (London Screenwriters Workshop)
clipped from in.news.yahoo.com
|
**NOW FREE: my 1997 ground-breaking hypertext tutorial: Screenwright: the craft of screenwriting ... Get the free Android app / alt download... Reviews
*Ebook, website, podcasting: Write Your First Screenplay
*Paperback: Practical Screenwriting
J.D. Salinger
2 comments:
People who see UFOs are not (always) loons; they're just leaping to conclusions. Here are "10 reasons why you shouldn't believe in UFOs."
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21854
But the loons are more interesting. Like the guy yesterday who said he touched one, walked around it, then it took off like crazy. So either he IS a loon or ...? Why ASSUME he is a loon? Somebody should take him seriously enough to PROVE he is a loon -- or not.
Or the guy who left the postmortem about Roswell.
Seems to me if UFOs don't exist, then there's a ton of loons who otherwise appear to be reputable. Which is in itself a fascinating phenomenon!
I know what I saw but have no idea of its origin. It wasn't an hallucination because it (or rather, three in a pattern) crossed the sun when I was drawing sunspots with a projection from my telescope.
I have a hard time believing the abduction stuff, however, mainly because I don't trust hypnotism, which is how this stuff is usually revealed.
Post a Comment